View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0005871 | DarkRadiant | Selection System | public | 05.01.2022 22:44 | 02.04.2022 11:47 |
Reporter | Geep | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | normal | Reproducibility | always |
Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||
Product Version | 2.14.0 | ||||
Summary | 0005871: 4 minor problems manipulating an entity composed of primitives | ||||
Description | For an func_static composed of multiple brushes 1) Deleting one brush with Backspace results in wrong origin 2) Subsequent undo has group cycle problems 3) With fresh start, duplicating one brush with Space briefly has group cycle problem 4) Subsequent origin of entity in wrong place | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | Here I am calling the xyz widget without arrow heads the “offset-origin”. Create 2 brush cubes Select both, RMB, “Convert to func_static” Tab to select one of the cubes Delete it with Backspace In the 2D map view, the offset-origin is now in the wrong place BUG 1 Do undo (Ctrl-Z), restoring 2nd cube. Now tab to cycle. Behaves oddly. BUG 2 Start again Create 2 brush cubes Select both, RMB, “Convert to func_static” Tab to select one of the cubes Hit space to duplicate it. Move the new cube to separate place New cube, while correctly part of entity, does not immediately work with tab cycle BUG 3 So Escape, then reselect entity. Tab cycle now works. But when whole entity selected, offset-origin appears, in wrong place BUG 4 | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Settings this to acknowledged. Just to put it out there, I must admit that I have a hard time with package-deal-issues like this, from both the motivational and organisational perspective. In order to be able to set this to resolved, I have to fix 4 issues instead of one, that's probably part of the reason this is has been sitting around for so long. Since the bugtracker is also the source of the changelog, I'll have to go through this and split it up into separate issues. No hard feelings from my side, I just intended to explain my perspective. On a more positive note, you did a good job on capturing the reproduction steps (which is something that is not to be taken for granted too!), so thanks for that. | |