View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0003466 | The Dark Mod | Def / Setup | public | 28.06.2013 18:03 | 30.06.2013 21:42 |
Reporter | Springheel | Assigned To | Springheel | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | normal | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | TDM 2.00 | ||||
Summary | 0003466: Remove Persontype: Elite | ||||
Description | There really shouldn't be a need for this persontype; only 2 AI types use this. Rank should handle any special behaviour, and it will cause problems for greetings. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Also, most characters will need specific "to_builder" greetings. | |
When determining the response to a greeting, PERSONTYPE_ELITE, PERSONTYPE_NOBLE, and PERSONTYPE_PRIEST are considered equivalent. If the responder is one of these, they bark "snd_response_positive". If not, and the greeter is one of these, the responder barks "snd_response_positive_superior". So I assume we'll simply remove PERSONTYPE_ELITE from that set. |
|
Yes. IIRC there's also something that checks rank, which should cover it. | |
PERSONTYPE_ELITE is used if one or both AI have a rank of '0'. What will ELITE be replaced with? |
|
There were only two characters using it, and I've switched them to PROGUARD. The elite citywatch wasn't even using it. I think the only characters with a rank of 0 are beggars. Which means they would use "snd_response_positive_superior" to anyone other than another beggar (since "snd_response_positive_superior" is used when the greeter's rank is higher than the responder's, IIRC). |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
28.06.2013 18:03 | Springheel | New Issue | |
28.06.2013 18:03 | Springheel | Status | new => assigned |
28.06.2013 18:03 | Springheel | Assigned To | => Springheel |
28.06.2013 18:37 | Springheel | Note Added: 0005610 | |
29.06.2013 01:03 | grayman | Note Added: 0005613 | |
29.06.2013 01:11 | Springheel | Note Added: 0005615 | |
29.06.2013 02:45 | grayman | Note Added: 0005616 | |
29.06.2013 11:46 | Springheel | Note Added: 0005617 | |
29.06.2013 11:47 | Springheel | Note Edited: 0005617 | |
30.06.2013 21:42 | Springheel | Status | assigned => resolved |
30.06.2013 21:42 | Springheel | Resolution | open => fixed |