 |
Thanks Greebo |
|
|
As of version 2.13_rev26d5 this is still broken |
 |
What's the minimum width you can resize the Surface Inspector on your end? |
|
|
Hi Greebo as on 2.12 I currently use 366(w)*505(h), its as small as i could go before the text boxes in the 'texture Operations' section start overlapping. But It can go smaller than that if required (all the way down to 74*47, which is a bit daft.) Under 2.13+ the "Surface Inspector" window wont go any smaller than 565(w)*509(h) |
|
|
OK, for me it's about 460 pixels. I think mostly it's the minimum size of the fit texture boxes which span out the rest of the table which share the same proportions. 2021-09-07 21_38_14-Clipboard.png (15,217 bytes) |
|
|
Here is a screenshot of 2.12 over the top of 2.13, the 2.13 SI window wont scale down to the same size as 2.12 etc - Untitled.jpg (101,938 bytes) |
|
|
Yeah, ok, the 2.12 is cramped below its minimum required size it needs to render everything correctly. I can see whether I can squeeze out a few pixels by further reducing some stuff. |
|
|
My final offer: 331px 2021-09-09 20_07_37-unnamed.map.png (11,622 bytes) |
|
|
Thanks greebo. |
 |
Unfortunately we're back to crushed widgets on Linux (due to the much wider layout used by certain GTK styles). I guess we need to settle for OS-specific #ifdefs to control the minimum widget sizes, since the Windows users don't like the wider dialog (and don't have any problems with UI styles since there are no such things on Windows). surface.png (51,189 bytes) |
- Anonymous
